Open Letter To ‘Sons Of Anarchy’ Creator Kurt Sutter

Friday, February 11 by

When I interviewed Charlie Hunnam for his film The Ledge at Sundance I had no idea it would cause such a stir. I of course asked about his TV series “Sons of Anarchy” also. Hunnam expressed a difference of opinion on where the show had gone in the third season. “SOA” fans didn’t even believe he’d say anything contrary, so we posted the audio file of the exchange.

Now it seems “SOA” creator Kurt Sutter feels I baited his actor into slamming the show.

This is surprising because the Q&A was a literal transcription of the exchange. The question posed to Hunnam was “Where does Jax need to go in season four?”

For complete transparency, here is the entire 9 minute interview. It is Hunnam and The Ledge director Matthew Chapman together discussing the film, with my “SOA” questions at the end. The audio confirms I may fumble when asking some questions, but I have not altered any of the quotations.

I would be happy to speak with Mr. Sutter directly. I take issues of ethics seriously and would address any concerns he has.

I’m most surprised that as of now, nobody has contacted me directly about this issue.

Complete audio of our interview HERE.

Do you like this story?

COMMENTS

  1. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Lannymc

    “The audio confirms I may fumble some questions,”…..how convenient for you


  2. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Jazzy

    To the douche that baited CH, you Sir, are in the league of cunts. Go fuck yourself you odious snake!


  3. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Markgorloff

    Did you even listen? The “fumbling” has nothing to do with the controversial quote. Why don’t you learn about what you’re commenting on before you run your mouth?


  4. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    ASDFASDF

    YOU DIDN’T POST ALL OF WHAT CHARLIE FUCKING SAID YOU FUCK. YOU TOOK BITS AND PIECES OF HIS RESPONSE AND MADE IT SEEM LIKE HE WAS SLAMMING THE SHOW FOR YOUR OWN BENEFIT. YOU AND EVERYONE THAT WORKS FOR THIS PIECE OF SHIT WEBSITE WILL NEVER BE .001 PERCENT AS GOOD OF A WRITER AS KURT SUTTER IS. SO PLEASE, GO FUCKING KILL YOURSELF.


  5. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Myra Lowe

    I listened to the clip. Several times. As a former radio/television/print journalist, my opinion is this. You baited Mr. Hunnam. You had a 10 minute interview, and you were there to talk about the movie, The Ledge. You were NOT there to ask about SOA or anything else. .

    You actually baited Mr. Hunnan twice. The first timei was referring to his character in the movie as a a homophobic villian. He was pretty strong about calling you out for pigeon holing the character in that manner. Your use of the words ‘homophobic villian’ makes a body wonder if you even SAW the movie if that’s the kind of view of the character that you received. If/when I see the movie for myself, I might come away with the same feelin’ about the character.

    Mr. Hunnam did open up, and he and Mr. Chapman gave you some very good comments about the movie and the characters in the movie. . There was enough in that first seven minutes (save for the hair), that would make a good story. Nothing that would generate massive hits to the site, but a good story. Good enough that Charlie fans wanting to know about the film, and possibly really rabid SOA/Jax fans who live and breathe for all things CH would access.

    But that wasn’t good enough. Nope. You had to take two of those 10 minutes to throw Mr. Hunnam a curve ball, and get completely off the subject, which was the frackin’ movie! So you asked him what he thought needed to happen in S4. He answered on his thoughts, and he added what he would like to see happen if he were in charge of the writing.

    And there, Mr. Topel, is where I have the ethical, professional problem with you. I don’t have a problem with asking about other work, but I notice you didn’t give Mr. Chapman the same opportunity to plug. Course, you didn’t get the chance since you used up the last of the 10 mins with askin’ Mr. Hunnam about SOA. So I guess you’re owed that caveat.

    However, instead of writing a story that says what Mr. Hunnam thought was the motiviation of ‘The Ledge’, which is what you were there to cover in the first place, look at the title of your story. How much more inflammatory can you get? And there wasn’t a lot of information in your original story about ‘The Ledge’.

    Nope, you went for makin’ it look like Mr. Hunnam wasn’t happy with the way the Jax character is written and that he is at odds with Sutter. Anyone with a grain of sense in their head had the ability to look beyond the inflamed title and content to see that this wasn’t Mr. Hunnam’s intent nor desire.

    And since y’all didn’t get the attention ya wanted between 31 Jan and 10 Feb, all y’all had to put the short two min, 30 second clip on the web, just to try to support your already very fragile position, and to try to fan the flames some more.

    Nice try. Didn’t work.

    And you wonder why Sutter hasn’t contacted you directly. He commented on his blog. That’s the best place for it. I don’t think you would want to discuss the matter head on with Mr. Sutter. He doesn’t tolerate idiots well. And what you did, in the name of gettin’ attention, was iditiotic. You didn’t cover the story, you created the story where there wasn’t, and still isn’t one.

    So go ahead, sling away at me. My shoulders can take it. You’re the type of reporter that makes me glad to be out fo the business.
    Nope. Certainly nothing about ya gettin’ shot down for callin’ the Joe character a homophobic villian. Though the original link now brings one to the UPDATED story and not to the original nor the 2:30 audio clip, I read the original. Thoroughly. Several times.


  6. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Myra Lowe

    About 22 minutes ago by Fred Topel
    Open Letter To ‘Sons Of Anarchy’ Creator Kurt Sutter When I interviewed Charlie Hunnam for his film The Ledge at Sundance I had no idea it would cause such a stir. I of course asked about his TV series “Sons of Anarchy” also. Hunnam expressed a difference of opinion on where the show had gone in the third season. “SOA” fans didn’t even believe he’d say anything contrary, so we posted the audio file of the exchange.

    Now it seems “SOA” creator Kurt Sutter feels I baited his actor into slamming the show.

    This is surprising because the Q&A was a literal transcription of the exchange. The question posed to Hunnam was “Where does Jax need to go in season four?”

    For complete transparency, here is the entire 9 minute interview. It is Hunnam and The Ledge director Matthew Chapman together discussing the film, with my “SOA” questions at the end. The audio confirms I may fumble some questions, but I have not altered any of the quotations.

    I would be happy to speak with Mr. Sutter directly. I take issues of ethics seriously and would address any concerns he has.

    I’m most surprised that as of now, nobody has contacted me directly about this issue.

    Complete audio of our interview HERE.

    Do you like this story?

    Consider posting a comment.
    More about…
    Charlie Hunnam,kurt sutter,Sons Of Anarchy
    OTHER JUNK YOU MIGHT LIKE

    Eminem To Try His Hand at Boxing

    UPDATED: Charlie Hunnam Has Strong Thoughts On ‘Sons Of Anarchy’ And ‘The Ledge’

    Links Away: Seinfeld Plots World Domination
    Like
    Dislike
    Community Disqus
    LogoutAbout Disqus

    Glad you liked it. Would you like to share?Facebook
    Twitter
    ShareNo thanksSharing this page …
    Thanks! Close

    Add New Comment
    Logout @Lowecat
    0 comments 1 like received

    Share on Post as @Lowecat
    Showing 5 comments
    Sort by Popular now Best rating Newest first Oldest first Subscribe by email Subscribe by RSS
    Myra Lowe 0 minutes ago

    I listened to the clip. Several times. As a former radio/television/print journalist, my opinion is this. You baited Mr. Hunnam. You had a 10 minute interview, and you were there to talk about the movie, The Ledge. You were NOT there to ask about SOA or anything else. .

    You actually baited Mr. Hunnan twice. The first timei was referring to his character in the movie as a a homophobic villian. He was pretty strong about calling you out for pigeon holing the character in that manner. Your use of the words ‘homophobic villian’ makes a body wonder if you even SAW the movie if that’s the kind of view of the character that you received. If/when I see the movie for myself, I might come away with the same feelin’ about the character.

    Mr. Hunnam did open up, and he and Mr. Chapman gave you some very good comments about the movie and the characters in the movie. . There was enough in that first seven minutes (save for the hair), that would make a good story. Nothing that would generate massive hits to the site, but a good story. Good enough that Charlie fans wanting to know about the film, and possibly really rabid SOA/Jax fans who live and breathe for all things CH would access.

    But that wasn’t good enough. Nope. You had to take two of those 10 minutes to throw Mr. Hunnam a curve ball, and get completely off the subject, which was the frackin’ movie! So you asked him what he thought needed to happen in S4. He answered on his thoughts, and he added what he would like to see happen if he were in charge of the writing.

    And there, Mr. Topel, is where I have the ethical, professional problem with you. I don’t have a problem with asking about other work, but I notice you didn’t give Mr. Chapman the same opportunity to plug. Course, you didn’t get the chance since you used up the last of the 10 mins with askin’ Mr. Hunnam about SOA. So I guess you’re owed that caveat.

    However, instead of writing a story that says what Mr. Hunnam thought was the motiviation of ‘The Ledge’, which is what you were there to cover in the first place, look at the title of your story. How much more inflammatory can you get? And there wasn’t a lot of information in your original story about ‘The Ledge’.

    Nope, you went for makin’ it look like Mr. Hunnam wasn’t happy with the way the Jax character is written and that he is at odds with Sutter. Anyone with a grain of sense in their head had the ability to look beyond the inflamed title and content to see that this wasn’t Mr. Hunnam’s intent nor desire.

    And since y’all didn’t get the attention ya wanted between 31 Jan and 10 Feb, all y’all had to put the short two min, 30 second clip on the web, just to try to support your already very fragile position, and to try to fan the flames some more.

    Nice try. Didn’t work.

    And you wonder why Sutter hasn’t contacted you directly. He commented on his blog. That’s the best place for it. I don’t think you would want to discuss the matter head on with Mr. Sutter. He doesn’t tolerate idiots well. And what you did, in the name of gettin’ attention, was iditiotic. You didn’t cover the story, you created the story where there wasn’t, and still isn’t one.

    So go ahead, sling away at me. My shoulders can take it. You’re the type of reporter that makes me glad to be out fo the business.


  7. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Rebel8

    who the fuck is fred topel? remind us why we care about his opinion…


  8. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Anonymous

    Not to discredit your opinion but wanted to point out that Charlie Hunnam doesn’t portray Joe in the ‘The Ledge’. He plays Gavin, the non-homophobic character.


  9. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Nice Rant

    I think I listened to a different clip. How is asking a one-off question about the show baiting? CH could have replied any way he wanted, and he chose to talk about his feelings on the writing. Granted, he took a small part of the interview and made it the focus, but I still don’t get where CH was “tricked” into giving his opinion. Nothing was taken out of context. It was an honest reply to a straight forward question. You can write 10 more paragraphs, and it won’t change a thing.


  10. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Wade Laserus

    us, there are some morons on the internet.

    Listen to the audio. This isn’t a hatchet job or some grand conspiracy; it’s all right there in the clip. As for whether it was “baiting” – it’s called asking questions. That’s a journalist’s job. We can assume that Hunnam is an able-minded adult who can answer questions with some degree of understanding as to what those questions mean, yes? Then it seems more that Hunnam had some strong opinions on the show and was using this particular question as a springboard to vent his frustrations with the show’s creative direction.

    As to why he chose to do it through a movie blog and not take it up with Sutter directly — well, that’s between Hunnam and Sutter. But the elephant in the room is that Charlie’s right; the show’s been on the creative skids since Season 1. The last season was unwatchable. And Sutter’s blog post was juvenile, crude and poorly written; no wonder SoA’s turned into such a PoS.

    You fanboys/fangirls need to get Sutter’s sack out of your mouths and wake up. Wrestling’s not real, the moon landing wasn’t faked and some actors actually give a shit when writers aren’t doing their jobs.


  11. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    CharlieH

    People don’t. But they do care about Charlie Hunnam, which is why they cry and bitch when they don’t like what they hear.


  12. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Triumph

    These comments are nice…for me to poop on!


  13. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Anonymous

    Lordy, lordy, look at all these pissed off comments!


  14. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Crystal Mincks

    I most definitely agree that you baited him. See Myra Lowe’s comments above as I agree completely. I think you may need to look up the actual definition of ethics before you claim to take them so seriously. To try to say that you had no idea that your “interview” would cause such a stir is laughable. You went in to that interview to cause trouble knowing that Kurt Sutter would stand up for himself, his show, and his actor. He is one of the most outspoken writers out there and of course he would speak out. You haven’t done anything that many other “journalists” have done in the past. Maybe it’s time to just admit you are no different than the others who want the attention on themselves rather than the subjects you are supposed to be writing about.


  15. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    GetMeDrunk

    I am a huge SOA fan, Charlie Hunnam fan, and Kurt Sutter fan. Let’s me get that out of the way. And I understand Kurt’s inclination to blast the blogger in defense of one of his actors. Myra, you seem like a totally devoted fan and that’s awesome but you couldn’t be more off base. It is not baiting or aggressive to merely ask an off topic question about the show that put Charlie Hunnam on the map. Quite expected actually. It is possible to be a fan of the show and Charlie and still understand that he stuck his foot in his mouth. Of course Charlie has a right to his opinion and a lot of people probably agree with it, but Charlie’s comments are a criticism of the creator and writers of the show and it probably isn’t wise to make such opinions public. I have no doubt that Kurt Sutter and his team can take it since the criticism wasn’t all that inflammatory to begin with, but seeing fans go on and on about how Charlie was baited and forced and that the blogger is an unethical weasel need to chill out. First fans were saying that Charlie didn’t say it at all, that the writer made it all up, and the audio came out and tunes had to change. Bottom line: Charlie goofed but defending him by putting it all on the interview is ridiculous. Life and SOA will go on. Time to move on to more important things in life. Charlie isn’t perfect but who is.


  16. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Blb0723

    Thanks for posting the whole clip. I think this is all an over reaction, and I don’t think you baited this actor at all. He seems like he’s running his mouth, which is what actors do because they’re paid to be the center of attention. When that’s your job, you think your opinion actually matters.

    Fans of the show can disagree all they want, but by coming on here, not looking at all the facts and listening to the files and then posting rants, you just look dumb.


  17. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Toni

    Charlie is right, many forums for the show had fans saying the smae last season. Some forums have real bikers who said it and even called her “just Clay’s old lady”. Geez, way to make make something out of nothing but an opinion.


  18. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Chase2418

    I listned to this interview twice and as a former reporter what I heard was a definete skip in the audio, between talking about “the ledge” salad dropping, and “so what do you see for Jax in season 4″ huh? The continuty was all off like the tape recorder had been turned off and then turned back on again to start on a new subject, without evem metioning that they were going to talk about that. Usally you would hear “You mind if we talk about SOA for a minute? or “Hey I’m a huge Sons fan, can we talk briefly about what you see for season 4, just to give the fans a tidbit?” but nothing just Bang! Slam! right into one topic from another..dosent sound right. I do agree that Topel took the two minute bit about Gemma and turned it into a headline for his own use which is unethical to say the least. Yes Charlie said these things, but in listening to the audio he did not sound, angy, disgrunteled, or fustrated, he was sharing his opinon as an actor from an actors point of view…As a huge fan of SOA..I was a little dissapointed by season three..but I dont think it had to do with the writing as much as the storyline…Getting the boys to Ireland, and trying to get Able back and the murderous priest..we can take all that, but bring in a incetous trelationship with your stepsister ..WHEW! that made me sick..but I will stick around for seasonas 4,5,6, 7, becuase what I can hear from this audio and from the blog that Kurt Sutter posted..albeite a liitle rougher in content are two articulate human beings, who are honest and care about the respect for their fellow actors as well as their craft.

    Sutter might have put it a little harsher, but he showed that Charlie cares about the people he is working with and their opnion of him. As a person who is constantly feeling like they have to apologize for things that she does that might get misconstruted because of other people, and then told later “Why are you apologizing you did nothing wriong. Whe Sutter said Charlie called him before the story came out, this shows that he cares a great dela about what the people he worls with think. Granted he needs to pullback somwehat and learn to stop stiking the foot in the mouth, maybe just stick the toe of the shoe there, because in the long run..this is who he is,and he’s not going to make apologies for it. This is what we love, and I don’t think he should change all that much…all I ever hear is that he is a wonderful person, who loves his job, loves the people he works with, and is really nice, kind, guy who is very professional. Isn’t that good enough? Why do peope like Topel have to bring someone down as soon as they start to get a little attention..Is it just me or did it also sounded at the beginning that Topel might have been htting on him with the long hair comment? Hmmmm, so may be he turned him down? Did they get that on tape ? Not insinuating anything just an opnion,so Charlie dosen’t know when to shut, and he drinks, smokes, swears like a truck driver (in front of woan no less, I have the season 2 DVD..not great), rides a halrey and seems to be honest to a fault. Welcome to the age of a rough and tumble man’s man theyr’e not aways perfect…but isn’t that why love them anayway?

    etc, If I missspelled anything, or left something out please don’t harp on my reporting skills at least I’m one of those reporters that is honest enough that when I DO EDITING that I need a little help..unfortunatley I am also a fast typer and spell chack not avalaible.


  19. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Wallybchamp

    this show is a soap opera with motorcycles. try to man it up all you want. but katie seagal’s busted old titties just aint gonna do it for me.
    sincerely,
    a SAMCRO fan from season one but none since.


  20. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Stillstanding2

    We all get exactly what we put out!!!! You put out negative,you get negative. It is my hope you choose different next time(interview). Only you know your true intention.


  21. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Stillstanding2

    We all get exactly what we put out!!!! You put out negative,you get negative. It is my hope you choose different next time(interview). Only you know your true intention.


  22. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Anonymous

    I support Fred 100%. Kurt Sutter is known for being one of the biggest douchebag creative-types in the TV business. Don’t back down Fred and don’t let this jackass using his huge social media platform to goad his Sons of Anarchy sheep fans into scaring you off. You did absolutely nothing wrong.


  23. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Anonymous

    I support Fred 100%. Kurt Sutter is known for being one of the biggest douchebag creative-types in the TV business. Don’t back down Fred and don’t let this jackass using his huge social media platform to goad his Sons of Anarchy sheep fans into scaring you off. You did absolutely nothing wrong.


  24. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Dragonflygurl4u

    RIGHT ON MYRA! You hit the nail on it’s “villaneous” head! If Fred Toppel has any gray matter left, he would certainly not want to have a face to face conversation with Kurt Sutter ( or Katey for that matter).He would be way out of his league. He should stick to interviewing the likes of Kate Gosselin, the Kardashians, Jennifer Anniston, The Octomammy, and other publicity HO’s and leave Kurt Sutter, Charlie Hunnam and all the other SONS ALONE!!


  25. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Dragonflygurl4u

    RIGHT ON MYRA! You hit the nail on it’s “villaneous” head! If Fred Toppel has any gray matter left, he would certainly not want to have a face to face conversation with Kurt Sutter ( or Katey for that matter).He would be way out of his league. He should stick to interviewing the likes of Kate Gosselin, the Kardashians, Jennifer Anniston, The Octomammy, and other publicity HO’s and leave Kurt Sutter, Charlie Hunnam and all the other SONS ALONE!!


  26. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Dragonflygurl4

    In my best filipino impersonation,,,,,,Mr Laserus……PUCKYOU.
    SONS of Anarchy is by far the best show that has been on TV in decades,,,, It is rated for Mature Audiences…for content, violence, brief nudity, …well you get the idea. Just because YOU don’t care for Sutters Blog ( then why did you READ IT?) there are many of us “fanboys/girls” who are quite capable of being a loyal fan of Sutter INC without the need to have Sutter’s sack in our mouthes. If Mommy won’t let you stay up late to watch FX and great TV, there are many other options for you and your chumbums to look at!


  27. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Dragonflygurl4

    In my best filipino impersonation,,,,,,Mr Laserus……PUCKYOU.
    SONS of Anarchy is by far the best show that has been on TV in decades,,,, It is rated for Mature Audiences…for content, violence, brief nudity, …well you get the idea. Just because YOU don’t care for Sutters Blog ( then why did you READ IT?) there are many of us “fanboys/girls” who are quite capable of being a loyal fan of Sutter INC without the need to have Sutter’s sack in our mouthes. If Mommy won’t let you stay up late to watch FX and great TV, there are many other options for you and your chumbums to look at!


  28. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Dragonflygurl4u

    PUCK YOU ….Do you think Kurt Sutter would give a flying Norwegian Fluck what you think of him? SOA fans are solid & loyal, and come from all over the globe…where are your fans, Ace?
    Getting their pictures taken for the Walmartian posts?


  29. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Dragonflygurl4u

    PUCK YOU ….Do you think Kurt Sutter would give a flying Norwegian Fluck what you think of him? SOA fans are solid & loyal, and come from all over the globe…where are your fans, Ace?
    Getting their pictures taken for the Walmartian posts?


  30. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Dragonflygurl4u

    She would not pea on you if you were on fire, Wallymartchump!!


  31. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Dragonflygurl4u

    She would not pea on you if you were on fire, Wallymartchump!!


  32. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Anonymous

    It’s possible to be a fan of Sons of Anarchy without being a fan of Kurt Sutter, Douchebag Extraordinaire. I do it all the time. I’m a huge Skins fan, doesn’t mean I’d give Daniel Snyder a glass of water if I saw him wasting away in the desert.


  33. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Anonymous

    It’s possible to be a fan of Sons of Anarchy without being a fan of Kurt Sutter, Douchebag Extraordinaire. I do it all the time. I’m a huge Skins fan, doesn’t mean I’d give Daniel Snyder a glass of water if I saw him wasting away in the desert.


  34. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Pam Bottila

    I HAD TO GO BACK AND READ THAT AGAIN( ‘PENISES ARE LIKE SNOWFLAKES’) LOL AND AS FOR CHARLIE HE BETTER NOT LEAVE WE LOVE HIM !!!!!!! <3<3<3,


  35. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Pam Bottila

    I HAD TO GO BACK AND READ THAT AGAIN( ‘PENISES ARE LIKE SNOWFLAKES’) LOL AND AS FOR CHARLIE HE BETTER NOT LEAVE WE LOVE HIM !!!!!!! <3<3<3,


  36. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Scott Whitt

    I guess you typed your response because you are unable to speak since you DO have Sutter’s balls in your mouth. SOA has sucked since Season 1. They only exceptions are the season openers and finales. Apparently Mr. Sutter forgot that there a bunch of other episodes in between. I do not see how that was a “bait question”. A bait question would have been”The consensuses is that the show took a step back this season, why is that?” Plus if this was such an obvious bait question why didn;t Chuckie just say ” I want to talk about the movie” or
    “We have a great staff and I am sure that they will continue doing a terrific job.”
    Instead he said what he has been thinking and stepped in it. The only thing that is certain is that SOA fans are as big a bunch of chickensh*t keyboard warriors as the overrated creator is. I would be more scared in Peg Bundy was threatening me that some middle aged d-bag writer. hey Kurt if I want to watch The Shield not a watered down re-imagining of it.


  37. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Scott Whitt

    I guess you typed your response because you are unable to speak since you DO have Sutter’s balls in your mouth. SOA has sucked since Season 1. They only exceptions are the season openers and finales. Apparently Mr. Sutter forgot that there a bunch of other episodes in between. I do not see how that was a “bait question”. A bait question would have been”The consensuses is that the show took a step back this season, why is that?” Plus if this was such an obvious bait question why didn;t Chuckie just say ” I want to talk about the movie” or
    “We have a great staff and I am sure that they will continue doing a terrific job.”
    Instead he said what he has been thinking and stepped in it. The only thing that is certain is that SOA fans are as big a bunch of chickensh*t keyboard warriors as the overrated creator is. I would be more scared in Peg Bundy was threatening me that some middle aged d-bag writer. hey Kurt if I want to watch The Shield not a watered down re-imagining of it.


  38. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Scott Whitt

    Pea is a vegetable you idiot. Pee is the act of urinating.


  39. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Scott Whitt

    Pea is a vegetable you idiot. Pee is the act of urinating.


  40. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Pat

    Whether one agrees or disagrees with a critic’s comments, name calling is never the way to go.
    Personal attacks and cursing, nullify anything else you write.


  41. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    RedSnow 0.9.6rc9

    Thnx for such a nice post


  42. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Maureen Hanson

     Well said Myra, absolutely spot on…Love it..xx


  43. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Anonymous

    dit is mijn eerste
    keer hier en ik moet ik toegeven dat als dit web-bron, bedankt voor het delen
    van zo veel, ik wil alles met je praten en om uit te vinden wat u allemaal op
    het punt om volgende maand te doen. Zoals voor mij dat ik staterd gitaar
    lessen en als ik vrije tijd heb ik last van mezelf te spelen  online gokken
     


  44. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Anonymous

    dit is mijn eerste
    keer hier en ik moet ik toegeven dat als dit web-bron, bedankt voor het delen
    van zo veel, ik wil alles met je praten en om uit te vinden wat u allemaal op
    het punt om volgende maand te doen. Zoals voor mij dat ik staterd gitaar
    lessen en als ik vrije tijd heb ik last van mezelf te spelen  online gokken
     


  45. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Anonymous

    dit is mijn eerste
    keer hier en ik moet ik toegeven dat als dit web-bron, bedankt voor het delen
    van zo veel, ik wil alles met je praten en om uit te vinden wat u allemaal op
    het punt om volgende maand te doen. Zoals voor mij dat ik staterd gitaar
    lessen en als ik vrije tijd heb ik last van mezelf te spelen  online gokken
     


  46. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Anonymous

    dit is mijn eerste
    keer hier en ik moet ik toegeven dat als dit web-bron, bedankt voor het delen
    van zo veel, ik wil alles met je praten en om uit te vinden wat u allemaal op
    het punt om volgende maand te doen. Zoals voor mij dat ik staterd gitaar
    lessen en als ik vrije tijd heb ik last van mezelf te spelen  online gokken
     


  47. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Anonymous

    dit is mijn eerste
    keer hier en ik moet ik toegeven dat als dit web-bron, bedankt voor het delen
    van zo veel, ik wil alles met je praten en om uit te vinden wat u allemaal op
    het punt om volgende maand te doen. Zoals voor mij dat ik staterd gitaar
    lessen en als ik vrije tijd heb ik last van mezelf te spelen  online gokken
     


  48. February 11, 2011 10:42 am

    Anonymous

    dit is mijn eerste
    keer hier en ik moet ik toegeven dat als dit web-bron, bedankt voor het delen
    van zo veel, ik wil alles met je praten en om uit te vinden wat u allemaal op
    het punt om volgende maand te doen. Zoals voor mij dat ik staterd gitaar
    lessen en als ik vrije tijd heb ik last van mezelf te spelen  online gokken