<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Screen Junkies &#187; waynes world</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/waynes-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com</link>
	<description>Movie Reviews &#38; TV Show Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How To Make A Film That Withstands the Test of Time</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/how-to-make-a-film-that-withstands-the-test-of-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/how-to-make-a-film-that-withstands-the-test-of-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Penn Collins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clueless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friends With Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurassic park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the proposal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waynes world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wes andersonclueless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=227038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do Wes Anderson films have in common with 'Clueless'? You can watch them a decade later without wanting to gouge your eyes out. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the type of person who regularly finds himself being spoon-fed cable movies as a result of a remarkably sedentary lifestyle, I&#8217;m frequently revisiting beloved movies of my youth with curiously mixed results. If one was to take a sampling of the movies I enjoyed from my childhood and teenage years, only a fraction hold my interest today. Of course, many of the rejects can be attributed to the fact that my tastes in films have changed. This is an easy, answer. Too easy, in fact.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s dismissive to assume that a film that fails to hold up after twenty or ten or two years is the result of a change in the viewer. Many of these films were not designed to hold up. Sprinkled with popular references, dated soundtracks, and borderline-retarded notions of what the future had in store for us, some films have a cultural shelf life that&#8217;s about as long as an episode of <em>Access Hollywood</em>.</p>
<p>The durability of films from this era is a curious phenomenon. One movie that completely exists in its time, like <em>Clueless</em>, holds up extremely well, having made the transition from “topical” to “charming,” while a movie like <em>Wayne’s World</em> captures a similar point <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/films/in-time' class='linkify' target='_blank'>in time</a> and a similar niche, also developing its own weird vocabulary for its characters. I use these two examples because a) they act as an example and a cautionary tale, respectively, and b) both of these films were extremely well-received and regarded as &#8220;important&#8221; in their day. </p>
<p>So how does <em><a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/genres-movies/comedies/clueless-cast/" target="_blank">Clueless</a></em> stay with us after these years, while <em><a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/genres-movies/comedies/waynes-world-quotes/" target="_blank">Wayne’s World</a></em> shakes out as borderline unwatchable? (<em>Wayne’s World 2</em> even more so, but mostly because it’s just a terrible film)</p>
<p>These are just two examples of films that either fight or give in to the ravages of time. <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/comedies/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Comedies</a> seem especially prone, as does any film that tries to tell us what the future will be like. The recipe to make a film popular at the time of its release is by no means the same one used to insure it’s popularity a decade, or even a few years later.</p>
<p>The touch-points required to last aren’t exactly rocket science, but striking the balance between contemporary relevance and durability is bit trickier. In order to ensure that I can sit around like a beached whale on Sundays while enjoying the highest caliber of entertainment from the past 20 years, I’ve compiled a definitive guide of how things should be done so that I may enjoy your film in 2017 as much as I enjoyed it in 2011.</p>
<p>You’re welcome in advance, Hollywood.</p>
<p><strong>Stay Away From Technology You Don’t Understand. Seriously. Stay Away From It. You Never Will Never Get It Right And You Will Look Ridiculous.</strong><br />
<a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/tumblr_ljasfokDGN1qbbjyco1_500.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-227046" title="tumblr_ljasfokDGN1qbbjyco1_500" src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/tumblr_ljasfokDGN1qbbjyco1_500.png" alt='' width="500" height="292" /></a></p>
<p><em>Before I go any further with the categories and examples, it warrants mentioning that a bad movie, no matter how much it sticks to these magnificent guidelines I’m  laying out, won’t stand the test of time. It won’t be popular or “good” when it’s at its most relevant, so don’t expect it to age from vinegar to wine as time marches on. <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/bad-movies/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Bad movies</a> will always be bad, whereas good movies can remain as such, or lose their luster over time.</em></p>
<p><strong>Bad Examples: <em>Disclosure</em>, <em>The Lawnmower Man</em>, <em>The Net</em>, <em>Hackers</em>, <em>Jurassic Park</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>Good Examples: <em>You’ve Got Mail</em>, <em>Sneakers</em>, <em>Enemy of the State</em>, <em>Back to the Future 2, Jurassic Park</em></strong></p>
<p>Make reasonable assumptions about the future of technology. When you make huge leaps forward, at least do them with enough creativity that they seem like an inspired inclusion (powerlaces, hoverboards, dinosaur cloning) rather than some half-assed stab at what the future might bring (any scene from 1991-1997 that involved virtual reality, hackers with nose rings).</p>
<p>If your cool characters are “techies,” make them cool people that happen to be techies, like in <em>Sneakers</em>, rather than people who are cool because they’re techies, like in <em>Hackers</em> or that obnoxious little girl Lex from <em>Jurassic Park</em>.</p>
<p>Move forward simply and no one will get hurt. <em>You’ve Got Mail</em>, while not a personal favorite, added simple logical elements (email, internet dating) to staid concepts (pen pals, blind dating). While AOL might as well be making buggy whips these days, the genetics of the concept nonetheless read as quaint, rather than ephemeral.</p>
<p>If you’re going to dabble in technology, think long and hard about how this will look in one short decade if you’re wrong. Don’t worry about what happens if you’re right. It happens so rarely, it’s not really worth considering.</p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Celebrity Cameos: Bob Barker, But Not Jerry Springer</span><br />
<a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Screen-shot-2011-09-02-at-4.16.00-PM.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-227049" title="Screen shot 2011-09-02 at 4.16.00 PM" src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Screen-shot-2011-09-02-at-4.16.00-PM.png" alt='' width="500" height="345" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Bad Examples: <em>Austin Powers 2</em>, <em>Dodgeball</em>, <em>Friends with Benefits</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>Good Examples: <em>Singles</em>, <em>Wayne’s World</em>, <em>Zoolander</em>, <em>Happy Gilmore</em>, <em>Jerry Maguire</em></strong></p>
<p>If you want to allow your viewers to watch the film without being ripped out of its universe, don’t toss in some flavor-of-the-month that people will have to rack their brain to understand the significance of years after it occurs. Having your characters resolve their problems on <em>The Jerry Springer Show</em> wasn’t particularly inspired when <em>Austin Powers 2</em> did it in 1999. It seems downright lazy and unfunny now, just like the Springer show itself. Same with Shaun White in <em>Friends with Benefits</em>, <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/ryan-seacrest/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Ryan Seacrest</a> in <em>Knocked Up</em>, and Tabitha Soren (or anyone from MTV) in <em>Black Sheep’s</em> painfully dated “Rock the Vote” scene. (Shame on you, Mudhoney. Shame on your eyes.)</p>
<p>Topical cameos can be funny, so long as they’re absurd or relevant enough to hold up. I wouldn’t want to live in a world where Billy Zane didn’t pop up in <em>Zoolander</em>, nor <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/pearl-jam/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Pearl Jam</a> in <em>Singles</em>. The fact remains that, in these universes, Zane was supposed to be at that fashion show and walk-off, and Pearl Jam were supposed to be dicking around at a coffee shop in Seattle in 1992. Dr. Evil and Scotty weren’t supposed to be on <em>Springer</em>, but they were there nonetheless. And it doesn’t feel right.</p>
<p>Bob Barker wasn’t supposed to be beating the living hell out of <em>Happy Gilmore</em>, but the absurdity of it sells it, because Bob Barker is so not supposed to be in the film, let alone punching Happy. That it’s ridiculous enough to swing back around to durable.</p>
<p>Further: No reality television star references or appearances. Ever.  No one in 2025 will be happy that Omarosa or Evan Marriott appeared in an <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/adam-sandler-149/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Adam Sandler</a> film. You probably don’t even know who those people are, which solidifies my point.<br />
<strong><br />
Click &#8216;Next Page&#8217; to continue&#8230;<br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/how-to-make-a-film-that-withstands-the-test-of-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 Awkward Rock Star Cameos</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/7-awkward-rock-star-cameos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/7-awkward-rock-star-cameos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 22:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wookie Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beverly hills 90210]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Petty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waynes world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=226921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They'll have to find comfort in their Grammy Awards.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many well-known <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/musicians/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>musicians</a> and <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/10-best-rock-star-film-performances/" target="_blank">rock stars</a> who have been able to parlay their <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/fame/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>fame</a> into successful acting careers. Then there are others who have not. In fact, thereare a few that have had trouble even playing themselves. In other cases, the performances are awesome but their cameos are just so out of left field that it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/tv/tv-news/awkward-star-ashley-rickards-loves-both-ghandi-and-daria/" target="_blank">awkward</a> to watch.</p>
<p>Here a seven rock stars who won&#8217;t win any acting prizes and will have to find comfort in their Grammy <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/awards/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Awards</a> and throngs of screaming fans.</p>
<h4>Gwar, <em>Empire Records</em><br />
<object width="450" height="345" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pHEDNqZ9FrI?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="450" height="345" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pHEDNqZ9FrI?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" allowFullScreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" /></object></h4>
<p>If you give it a good listen, this one doesn&#8217;t fall on Gwar&#8217;s shoulders. They actually redubbed the voice of Oderus Urungus because, &#8220;I refused to do the stupid lines they had so they just took out my voice and put in what they needed. I had no idea until I saw it!&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s too bad the other rock and roll stars on this list can&#8217;t say the same.</p>
<h4>The Ramones, <em>Rock N&#8217; Roll High School</em><br />
<object width="450" height="345" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oba8EqU0Yg4?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="450" height="345" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oba8EqU0Yg4?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" allowFullScreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" /></object></h4>
<p>As awesome as <em>The Ramones</em> are, they should stick to drunkenly stumbling about the stage and recording studio, not a film set.</p>
<h4>Tom Petty, <em>The Postman</em><br />
<object width="450" height="345" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cDRa8FDL2ts?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="450" height="345" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cDRa8FDL2ts?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" allowFullScreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" /></object></h4>
<p>Of course, Tom Petty survives the <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/apocalypse/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>apocalypse</a> and goes on to manage a settlement. And I&#8217;m not talking about Tom Petty playing a guy who manages a settlement. I&#8217;m talking about Tom Petty playing <em>Tom Petty managing a settlement</em>.  I guess it&#8217;s not that far fetched when you consider how he kept the Heartbreakers in line all those years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/7-awkward-rock-star-cameos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wayne And Garth Predict Oscars, Party Like It’s 1991</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/video/wayne-and-garth-predict-oscars-party-like-its-1991/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/video/wayne-and-garth-predict-oscars-party-like-its-1991/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 19:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Horwitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academy awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dana carvey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike myers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waynes world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?post_type=Video&#038;p=25205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dana Carvey hosted SNL this weekend, and Mike Myers joined him for the show's cold open, featuring a brand new installment of Aurora, Illinois' favorite public access show, Wayne's World.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/dana-carvey/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Dana Carvey</a> hosted <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/tv/tv-news/jesse-eisenberg-to-host-snl-make-cast-extremely-uncomfortable/">SNL</a> this weekend. I think he did, although I could have just stepped into a halfway entertaining time machine and emerged in a bygone era of <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/late-night-988/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>late night</a> television. <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/mike-myers-484/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Mike Myers</a> joined Carvey for the show&#8217;s cold open, a new(!) episode of Aurora, Illinois&#8217; favorite public access show, <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/10-funniest-famous-comedy-duos/">&#8220;Wayne&#8217;s World</a>.&#8221; The duo, looking every bit the same as the last time we saw them, recited their same old jokes in their same exact set. Seriously, do they have all the old sets and props in storage? Have they preserved <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/rob-schneider-101/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Rob Schneider</a>&#8216;s Makin&#8217; Copies-guys&#8217; Xerox machine somewhere? Stupid question, it&#8217;s clearly in the Smithsonian. The duo ran down their picks for the upcoming Academy Awards, and made numerous dick jokes about <em>Winter&#8217;s Bone</em>, or as is Myers&#8217; M.O., the same <em>Winter&#8217;s Bone</em> joke numerous times. The whole sketch, and episode, was mildly comforting and at the same time irritating, much like a childhood security blanket that&#8217;s gotten scratchy or threadbare from being washed too many times. It was fun to see that the jokes, sets, characters, and performers hadn&#8217;t changed a bit in 20 years, but that&#8217;s also what made it kind of a downer. (<a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/lol-wayne-garths-2011-academy-awards-picks/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+slashfilm+%28%2FFilm%29" rel="nofollow">Slashfilm</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/video/wayne-and-garth-predict-oscars-party-like-its-1991/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 10/22 queries in 0.022 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 390/434 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn2.screenjunkies.com

 Served from: www.screenjunkies.com @ 2013-06-17 23:27:16 by W3 Total Cache -->