<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Screen Junkies &#187; The Hangover 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/the-hangover-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com</link>
	<description>Movie Reviews &#38; TV Show Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:21:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;The Hangover 3&#8242; Poster Indicates The Film Could Be Interesting</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/the-hangover-3-poster-indicates-the-film-could-be-interesting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/the-hangover-3-poster-indicates-the-film-could-be-interesting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 18:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Penn Collins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hangover 3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=253882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judging a movie by its poster. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear: I didn&#8217;t say it promised to be good, but rather, interesting. After the wildly underwhelming and painfully familiar <em>The Hangover 2</em> made an ass-ton of money at the box office, it was no surprise that a third installment would be in the works.</p>
<p>Director <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/todd-phillips-162/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Todd Phillips</a> swore it would be different and swore it would be the final one. And judging by this poster, it looks different all right. Take a look and imagine the possibilities.</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/The-Hangover-3-Poster-Harry-Potter-570x844.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-253884" title="The-Hangover-3-Poster-Harry-Potter-570x844" src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/The-Hangover-3-Poster-Harry-Potter-570x844.jpg" alt="" width="570" height="844" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/the-hangover-3-poster-indicates-the-film-could-be-interesting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check It, Bros: Bradley Cooper Confirms &#8216;Hangover 3&#8242;</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/check-it-bros-bradley-cooper-confirms-hangover-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/check-it-bros-bradley-cooper-confirms-hangover-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wookie Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Cooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ED HELMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hangover 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Phillips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zach galifianakis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=238851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone likes lots of money.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much like <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/shia-labeouf-528/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Shia LaBeouf</a>, we all knew there&#8217;d be another <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/mel-gibson-might-class-up-the-hangover-2/" target="_blank"><em>Hangover</em></a>. Now <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/actors-directors/dont-let-the-good-looks-fool-you-bradley-cooper-biography/" target="_blank">Bradley Cooper</a> has confirmed it. He&#8217;s also confirmed that nobody was happy with the formulaic approach to<em> <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/the-hangover-868/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>The Hangover</a> II</em> and that the third entry won&#8217;t serve up such a recognizable storyline. He tells TV host Graham Norton:</p>
<blockquote><p>“I hope we’ll start shooting next September. I know (director) <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/todd-phillips-162/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Todd Phillips</a> is working on the <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/script/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>script</a>. We stuck to the formula in the second one but the third would need to close the trilogy. I think it’ll take place in L.A. and not adhere to the structure.”</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know. Can we believe him that we&#8217;ll be entertained in a fresh and original way? The man is an <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/actor/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>actor</a> after all. He&#8217;s paid to make believe. This could just be one huge misdirect tailored to trick us into buying tickets for another chapter. Then again&#8230; those eyes. They&#8217;re so deep. I feel like I can see into his soul. It&#8217;s warm and honest there. (<a href="http://www.nationalledger.com/pop-culture-news/cooper-to-suffer-another-hango-262912.shtml" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">National Ledger</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/check-it-bros-bradley-cooper-confirms-hangover-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 5/14 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 340/354 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn2.screenjunkies.com

Served from: www.screenjunkies.com @ 2013-05-20 15:25:14 -->