<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Screen Junkies &#187; prequels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/prequels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com</link>
	<description>Movie Reviews &#38; TV Show Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:00:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>8 Critically Acclaimed Films That Deserve An Unnecessary Prequel</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/gallery/8-critically-acclaimed-films-that-deserve-an-unnecessary-prequel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/gallery/8-critically-acclaimed-films-that-deserve-an-unnecessary-prequel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noah Griffith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prequels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?post_type=gallery&#038;p=232436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kramers' marriage is going to last...I can feel it!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/sequels/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/blade-runner-prequels-and-sequels-are-going-to-happen/" target="_blank">prequels</a>, and <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/reboots-367/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>reboots</a> have been the bread and <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/butter-164/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>butter</a> of Hollywood since&#8230;well, since the beginning (it&#8217;s just a little more obvious now). As the old saying goes, there&#8217;s nothing new under the sun. Take a look at the horror classic, <em>The Thing</em>. Purists are up in arms about the <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/7-wildly-unnecessary-porn-parodies/" target="_blank">unnecessary</a> prequel, which opens today. But many forget that the <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/john-carpenter-211/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>John Carpenter</a> classic was itself a remake. When you get down to it, Hollywood is one big incestuous mess. </p>
<p><em>The Thing</em> is the latest example, but not all movies get turned into franchises. Usually, the critically <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/acclaimed/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>acclaimed</a> <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/flicks/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>flicks</a> manage to slip by. The hell with that, says I! I need to know the back story to <em>Kramer vs. Kramer</em>, and I need to know it now! Lets take a look at some critically acclaimed films that deserve an unnecessary prequel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/gallery/8-critically-acclaimed-films-that-deserve-an-unnecessary-prequel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 11/15 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 278/295 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn2.screenjunkies.com

 Served from: www.screenjunkies.com @ 2013-06-18 22:14:59 by W3 Total Cache -->