<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Screen Junkies &#187; flops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/flops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com</link>
	<description>Movie Reviews &#38; TV Show Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:00:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood&#8217;s Biggest Tax Write-Offs Of 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/hollywoods-biggest-tax-write-offs-of-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/hollywoods-biggest-tax-write-offs-of-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wookie Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie flops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=248152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The accountants at Warner Bros are going to get hand cramps.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2011 was a tough year for films at <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/the-box-538/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>the box</a> office. There were a <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/good/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>good</a> share of high profile bombs which means tax day is going to be a busy one in Hollywood. Amongst the write-offs are remakes and action epics, none of which were able to spark the interest of moviegoers. And so, as the accounting books are closed on 2011, we celebrate the top movies nobody bothered to see.</p>
<h4><em>Mars Needs Moms</em></h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/mars_needs_moms_review.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-248158" title="mars_needs_moms_review" src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/mars_needs_moms_review.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="271" /></a></p>
<p>The honor of bombiest bomb to ever have bombed in 2011 goes to <em>Mars Needs Moms</em>. Produced for $150 million, it has thus far grossed $39 million worldwide. Normally, animated <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/family-films/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>family films</a> like this clean up at the box office, but the creepy dead-eyed mutant aliens of <em>Mars</em> failed to entice youngsters.</p>
<h4><em>Sucker Punch</em></h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/sucker-punch-photo-jamie-chung-vanessa-hudgens.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-248161" title="sucker-punch-photo-jamie-chung-vanessa-hudgens" src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/sucker-punch-photo-jamie-chung-vanessa-hudgens.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>In the past, girls + underwear + slow motion have always added up to a hit. That&#8217;s why Warner Bros must be confused as they close the books on <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/zack-snyder-860/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Zack Snyder</a>&#8216;s <em>Sucker Punch</em>. The dreamlike action film earned $89.8 million on a budget of $82 million. So, yes it did turn a profit but hardly. If only <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/vanessa-hudgens-718/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Vanessa Hudgens</a> hadn&#8217;t gone and given it away for free on the Internet.</p>
<h4><em>Arthur</em></h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/arthur.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-248153" title="Arthur" src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/arthur.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="281" /></a></p>
<p>Warner Bros also felt the sting of a bomb with the remake of <em>Arthur</em>. Russell Brand stars as the filthy rich party boy who considers giving it all up for true love. The film barely eked out a profit $5.7 million. The lesson here is that Fitz &amp; The Tantrums can&#8217;t hold a candle to the widespread appeal of Christopher Cross.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/hollywoods-biggest-tax-write-offs-of-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 12 Biggest Flops Of The Past 12 Years</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/the-12-biggest-flops-of-the-past-12-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/the-12-biggest-flops-of-the-past-12-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wookie Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battlefield Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mars needs moms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicole Kidman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=241045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Starring Nicole Kidman is not necessarily a prerequisite.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it&#8217;s too early in 2012 to tell what movie is going to suck the hardest (although <em><a href="http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2012/02/big-miracle-flops-like-whale-titties" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Big Miracle</a></em> is certainly on it&#8217;s way), we can turn to the past and evaluate the missteps of Hollywood from yesteryear. Compiled below are a list of the biggest flops, one per year, spanning from 2000 to 2011. The classification was applied after careful calculations that factored in total <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/box-office-740/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>box office</a> gross, number of screens, per screen average and other math stuff that you&#8217;re just going to have trust. Whatever. Do you really want to be the guy defending <em>The Adventures of Pluto Nash</em>?</p>
<h4><em>Mars Needs Moms</em> (2011)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Mars-needs-moms-film-e1325477606434.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-241051" title="Mars needs moms film" src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Mars-needs-moms-film-e1325477606434.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="316" /></a></p>
<p>With a budget of $150 million, 2011&#8242;s biggest flop earned $39 million worldwide. <em>Mars Needs Moms</em> tells the story of a boy who takes his mother for granted but then goes to great lengths to save her when she&#8217;s abducted by an <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/alien-942/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>alien</a> race. Without any real star power attached, the motion-captured feature took a big risk putting all of its fate into a technology that has had a shaky history with moviegoers. As if losing $111 million weren&#8217;t bad enough, it must be terrible to admit having any participation in making this film.</p>
<h4><em>Jonah Hex</em> (2010)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Jonah_Hex-e1325477574600.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-241049" title="Jonah_Hex" src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Jonah_Hex-e1325477574600.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="337" /></a></p>
<p>Though $10.9 million on a $40 million production budget doesn&#8217;t seem like the hugest of losses, a lot was put behind publicity for this <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/comic-book-adaptation-674/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>comic book adaptation</a>. Planned to be a summer tentpole, the movie crashed in burned in America causing the studio to scrap a large rollout overseas. Word is that the studio lost as much as they typically earn from a <em>Harry Potter</em> film on <em>Hex</em>. But, one man&#8217;s trash is another man&#8217;s treasure. I find the film delightful and hilarious. Just not for the reasons filmmakers would have liked me to.</p>
<h4><em>Land of the Lost</em> (2009)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/land-of-the-lost-e1325477589692.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-241050" title="land-of-the-lost" src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/land-of-the-lost-e1325477589692.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="286" /></a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s sad to see this one on the list. Budgeted at $100 million, the adaptation of the classic show earned only $35 million at <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/films/the-box' target='_blank'>the box</a> office. The reason that it&#8217;s a shame for <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/land-of-the-lost-307/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Land of the Lost</a> to wind up on a flop list is because it really was an entertaining movie. Marketed COMPLETELY wrong as a goofy romp for kids that parents would enjoy too, it&#8217;s actually anything but that. In fact, it brought back the snarky vibe of an 80&#8242;s comedy that has been so missed in film. Give this one a shot. Unless you&#8217;re the type to have <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/will-ferrell-199/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Will Ferrell</a> fatigue. Then there&#8217;s no talking any reason into you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/the-12-biggest-flops-of-the-past-12-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 9/17 queries in 0.019 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 337/363 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn2.screenjunkies.com

 Served from: www.screenjunkies.com @ 2013-06-18 21:45:02 by W3 Total Cache -->