<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Screen Junkies &#187; Comedy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/comedy-152/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com</link>
	<description>Movie Reviews &#38; TV Show Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:15:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Alfred Hitchcock Intended &#8216;Psycho&#8217; To Be A Comedy</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/alfred-hitchcock-intended-psycho-as-a-comedy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/alfred-hitchcock-intended-psycho-as-a-comedy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 20:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wookie Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alfred Hitchcock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psycho]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=253445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He was just having a goof.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recently unearthed BBC interview with Alfred Hitchcock reveals we&#8217;ve been watching his horror classic <em>Psycho</em> all wrong. That&#8217;s right. The film most well-known for the brutal murder of a young woman at the hands of a carving knife-wielding transvestite was done as a goof.</p>
<p><span>&#8220;The content was, I felt, rather amusing and it was a big joke. I was horrified to find some people took it seriously,&#8221; said Hitchcock in 1964. </span></p>
<p>I think this is just a case of Hitchcock trying to be provocative. There&#8217;s no way that <em>Psycho</em> was meant to be received as a comedy, though it is much more funny than Russell Brand. (<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2275394/Alfred-Hitchcock-reveals-Psycho-meant-comedy-newly-unearthed-interview.html#axzz2KKZ2WWRm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Daily Mail</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/alfred-hitchcock-intended-psycho-as-a-comedy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC Does Something Right: Gives Jim Gaffigan A Show</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/tv/tv-news/nbc-does-something-right-gives-jim-gaffigan-a-show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/tv/tv-news/nbc-does-something-right-gives-jim-gaffigan-a-show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wookie Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim gaffigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=233977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice move, NBC!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news!! <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/actors-directors/jim-gaffigan-quotes/" target="_blank">Jim Gaffigan</a> has got his own show. Even better news!! It&#8217;s not on <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/cbs-713/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>CBS</a>.</p>
<p>That means he won&#8217;t be forced to ham it up in a multi-camera <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/sitcom-813/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>sitcom</a>. Instead, NBC has purchased a single-camera comedy focusing on his life as a lazy guy married to a strong woman who are raising four kids in a small <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/new-york-city/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>New York City</a> apartment. Sounds like a pretty sweet gig for a set builder.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/jim-gaffigan/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Jim Gaffigan</a> is a brilliant <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/comedian/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>comedian</a>, so it&#8217;s nice to see <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/nbc-490/" target="_blank">NBC</a> recognize a good thing when they see it. Though I sincerely doubt it will take on any dark themes,  this move seems to be a result of the success <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/fx-578/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>FX</a> has had with <em>Louie</em>. Or perhaps random guests from <em>Chelsea Lately</em> ran out of show ideas. (<a href="http://www.deadline.com/2011/10/nbc-buys-comedy-created-by-starring-actor-comedian-jim-gaffigan/#utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Deadline</a> via <a href="http://warmingglow.uproxx.com/2011/10/yay-a-jim-gaffigan-show" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Warming Glow</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/tv/tv-news/nbc-does-something-right-gives-jim-gaffigan-a-show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/films/bucky-larson-born-to-be-a-star/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/films/bucky-larson-born-to-be-a-star/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Screen Junkies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bucky larson: born to be a star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in theaters now]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick swardson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=228050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Director: Tom Brady Cast: Nick Swardson, Don Johnson, Christina Ricci Synopsis: A kid from the Midwest moves out to Hollywood in order to follow in his parents footsteps — and become a...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Director: </strong>Tom Brady</p>
<p><strong>Cast:</strong> Nick Swardson, <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/don-johnson/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Don Johnson</a>, <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/christina-ricci-622/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Christina Ricci</a></p>
<p><strong>Synopsis:</strong> A kid from the Midwest moves out to Hollywood in order to follow in his parents footsteps — and become a <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/porn-star-362/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>porn star</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Release Date:</strong> September 9, 2011</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/films/bucky-larson-born-to-be-a-star/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Good Old Fashioned Orgy</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/films/a-good-old-fashioned-orgy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/films/a-good-old-fashioned-orgy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 23:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Screen Junkies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A Good Old Fashioned Orgy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in theaters now]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason sudeikis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=228057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Director: Alex Gregory, Peter Huyck Cast: Jason Sudeikis, Leslie Bibb, Tyler Labine Synopsis: A group of 30-year-olds who have been friends sinc high school attempt to throw an end-of-summer orgy. Release Date: September...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Director: </strong>Alex Gregory, Peter Huyck</p>
<p><strong>Cast:</strong> Jason Sudeikis, <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/leslie-bibb-676/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Leslie Bibb</a>, <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/tyler-labine/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Tyler Labine</a></p>
<p><strong>Synopsis:</strong> A group of 30-year-olds who have been friends sinc <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/films/high-school' target='_blank'>high school</a> attempt to throw an end-of-summer orgy.</p>
<p><strong>Release Date:</strong> September 2, 2011</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/films/a-good-old-fashioned-orgy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>15 Comedy Sequels That Make Us Worried For &#8216;The Hangover Part II&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/15-comedy-sequels-that-make-us-worried-for-the-hangover-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/15-comedy-sequels-that-make-us-worried-for-the-hangover-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 13:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jame Gumb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghostbusters 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national lampoon's vacation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hangover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the hangover part II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=213267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If history teaches us anything, it's that sequels to blockbuster comedy films are usually garbage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know, <em>The Hangover Part II</em> premiers this weekend. And while the hype surrounding <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/todd-phillips-162/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Todd Phillips</a>&#8216; latest <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/genres-movies/indian/10-best-comedy-hindi-movies/" target="_blank">comedy</a> almost guarantees it will be a hit, the quality of the film is yet to be determined. I&#8217;m really hoping it turns out well. Unfortunately, it probably needs a lot more than my well wishes in order to succeed. If history teaches us anything, it&#8217;s that <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/best-sequels-that-dont-disappoint/" target="_blank">sequels</a> to blockbuster <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/comedy-films/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>comedy films</a> are usually garbage. Don&#8217;t believe me? Then take a look at the following 15 examples (although I probably could have listed 25). Let&#8217;s hope <em>The Hangover Part II</em> can buck the trend.</p>
<p><em>Note: There are many comedy sequels worse than the films listed here. But in our opinion, these are the most <strong>disappointing</strong>.</em></p>
<h4><em>Major League II</em> (1994)</h4>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="367" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RcVRpkKT4g0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="367" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RcVRpkKT4g0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><em>Major League</em> is to <em>Major League II</em> what <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/wesley-snipes-601/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Wesley Snipes</a> is to Omar Epps. This is due, in no small part, to the fact that Omar Epps replaced Wesley Snipes in the role of Willie Mays Hayes for the second installment. At any rate, the first film was fun to watch because it involved a group of underdogs overcoming the odds. Once they won their division at the end of the first film, they were no longer underdogs, so who gives a damn?</p>
<h4><em>Sister Act II: Back in the Habit</em> (1993)</h4>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="349" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/k80E5KTjvmA?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/k80E5KTjvmA?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Forcing a degenerate character played by Whoopi Goldberg to live with a bunch of devout nuns just screams comedy, especially if you&#8217;re a middle-aged woman. But for the sequel, Whoopi&#8217;s character returns of her own free will to help teach at the school. Since she wasn&#8217;t forced to be there, the tension was gone. Besides that, adding a class full of teenage minority stereotypes really didn&#8217;t help.</p>
<h4><em>Ace Ventura: When Nature Calls</em> (1995)</h4>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="367" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/n1ZVImkf_TQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="367" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/n1ZVImkf_TQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>The first <em>Ace Ventura</em> was stupid, yet hilarious. The sequel was also stupid, but was lacking in the hilarity department. Save for the Rhino-birth scene, I&#8217;m not sure there&#8217;s a single laugh to be found in this horribly thrown together follow-up.</p>
<h4><em>Porky&#8217;s II: The Next Day</em> (1983)</h4>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="367" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/u23Z4ksRvo8?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="367" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/u23Z4ksRvo8?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>How do you make a comedy about teens trying to get laid after all of the characters have already gotten laid? In all fairness, <em>American Pie II</em> was a tolerable film, so it can be done. But don&#8217;t ask the people behind <em>Porky&#8217;s II</em> how to do it, because they clearly don&#8217;t know.</p>
<h4><em>Blue <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/films/brothers' target='_blank'>Brothers</a> 2000</em> (1998)</h4>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="367" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_ESdH-CRUAE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="367" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_ESdH-CRUAE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t use the word atrocity often, mainly because I don&#8217;t go to a lot of war-crime tribunals. But to fans of the original <em>Blues Brothers</em>, this film was like the Mai Lai Massacre. And as with Mai Lai, most of those responsible were never held accountable for their actions.</p>
<h4><em>Weekend at <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/bernie-748/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Bernie</a>&#8216;s II</em> (1993)</h4>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="367" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZlCADShkhjk?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="367" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZlCADShkhjk?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><em>Weekend at Bernie&#8217;s</em> managed to stretch an already thin premise to the breaking point, but it resulted in a surprisingly tolerable film. The sequel had no such luck, and quickly devolved into a first-class shit show. Given the nature of the film, I&#8217;m willing to suspend disbelieve to a point. But once the reanimated corpse was magically dancing around on its own, I called shenanigans. Unfortunately, I was watching the film by myself because everyone else was at the prom, so no one heard me.</p>
<h4><em>Teen Wolf Too</em> (1987)</h4>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="367" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p2XVkDTO0UY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="367" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p2XVkDTO0UY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Considering the great work <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/jason-bateman-512/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Jason Bateman</a> has done over the past ten years, it&#8217;s easy to forget he was in <em>Teen Wolf Too</em>. But I didn&#8217;t forget. And I never friggen will. On a side note, if a sequel has the word &#8220;too&#8221; in it, there&#8217;s a 99% chance it&#8217;s going to suck. Which brings us &#8220;too&#8221; our next film.</p>
<h4><em>Look Who&#8217;s Talking Too</em> (1990)</h4>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="367" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_S_ux6f1Z_U?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="367" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_S_ux6f1Z_U?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Although it is seldom accomplished, there&#8217;s always a need to try and improve upon the original when making a sequel. If your big idea to improve upon your film is to add a voice over of Roseanne, you might as well not try at all. Although compared to <em>Look Who&#8217;s Talking Now</em>, this film looks like <em>The <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/godfather-210/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Godfather</a> II</em>.</p>
<h4><em>Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd</em> (2003)</h4>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="286" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hlLeVAzDvQw?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="286" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hlLeVAzDvQw?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Technically, this film is a prequel, so maybe it doesn&#8217;t belong on the list. Oh well.</p>
<p>In theory, the idea of the <em>Star Wars</em> prequels was promising because the original films set up an entire universe of colorful characters that people cared about, complete with an interesting back story. Sure, it didn&#8217;t turn out well, but the potential was there. Was there any potential for a <em>Dumb and Dumber</em> prequel starring two guys who look like <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/jim-carrey-388/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Jim Carrey</a> and <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/jeff-daniels/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Jeff Daniels</a>? We&#8217;re not talking about the origin of the <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/jedi-947/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Jedi</a>, here. We&#8217;re talking about a couple of morons. Who cares how they met?</p>
<h4><em>Evan Almighty</em> (2007)</h4>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="286" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y4OAUa8bo14?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="286" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y4OAUa8bo14?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Man, Jim Carrey films are really prevalent on this list (<em>Note: I meant the original films: Dumb and Dumber, Ace Ventura, Bruce Almighty</em>). That said, he can&#8217;t be held accountable for <em>Evan Almighty</em>. I know the film is supposed to have a heartfelt message about faith, but what kind of loving god would allow a movie like this to get made?</p>
<h4><em>European Vacation</em> (1985)</h4>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="367" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/L-W50U2RP6g?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="367" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/L-W50U2RP6g?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><em>Vacation</em> was a film that just about everybody could relate to. At one point or another, most of us have been forced to partake in the forced family fun that is a road trip. On the other hand, most of us have no <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/films/taken' target='_blank'>taken</a> part in an all-expenses paid European adventure that we won on a pig-themed game show. The franchise redeemed itself with <em>Christmas Vacation</em>, probably because almost everyone has had to deal with family members during the holidays. But, everything went back to hell with <em>Vegas Vacation</em>.</p>
<h4><em>Naked Gun 2 1/2: The Smell of Fear</em> (1991)</h4>
<p style="font-style: italic;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="286" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/H4RssRXLWhQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="286" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/H4RssRXLWhQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>The problem with making a sequel to a parody film is that the characters have almost no room to grow. Sure, you can stick them in a different, crazier situations, but it can&#8217;t help but feel like a retread of the original plot. That&#8217;s not necessarily a bad thing, if you&#8217;re in the mood for more of the same, and the <em>Naked Gun II</em> isn&#8217;t a horrible film on its own. But when compared to the original, there&#8217;s really no reason for it to exist.</p>
<h4><em>Austin Powers II</em> (1999)</h4>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="286" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tZCkksmJ0YI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="286" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tZCkksmJ0YI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Taking a swinging spy from the 60&#8242;s and dropping him into the post Cold-War era made for one of the funnier comedies of the past twenty years. But putting the fish back into water via a time travel plot just didn&#8217;t work. Instead of watching a guy make a fool out of himself, the sequel showed us an idiot interacting with a bunch of other like-minded idiots. That&#8217;s not funny, and after a while, it&#8217;s just annoying. To this day, any time someone says &#8220;yeah, baby,&#8221; I want to punch them in the face.</p>
<h4><em>Caddyshack II</em> (1988)</h4>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="367" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/saREFwdhKH0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="367" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/saREFwdhKH0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Caddyshack is one of the all-time classic comedy films. Unfortunately, Caddyshack II is one of the all-time worst sequels. Why is there such a drastic difference? The cast! Besides cameos by <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/chevy-chase-195/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Chevy Chase</a> and the gopher, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a single character from the original film. What&#8217;s the point of making a sequel when the only connection to the original is the setting (Bushwood County Club)? That&#8217;s like making a sequel to <em>The Big Lebowski</em>, and having the only connection be the bowling alley<em>. </em></p>
<h4><em>Ghostbusters II</em> (1989)</h4>
<p style="font-style: italic;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="367" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UnzH75FlwvU?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="367" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UnzH75FlwvU?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><div id='post_in_album' class='post_in_album'><a class='img' href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/gallery/warner-bros-releases-too-many-hangover-part-ii-stills/' title='Warner Bros. Releases Too Many 'Hangover Part II' Stills'><img src='http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/gallery/039hangover-part-ii039-too-many-stills/the-hangover-part-ii-movie-image-10.jpg'/></a><h3><span class='num'>14 photos</span><a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/gallery/warner-bros-releases-too-many-hangover-part-ii-stills/'>Warner Bros. Releases Too Many 'Hangover Part II' Stills</a></h3></div>And with that, I give you the mother of all disappointing comedy sequels, <em>Ghostbusters II</em>. It&#8217;s hard to put my finger on where the film goes wrong. Is a talking painting really that stupid when compared to a ghostly librarian? Is a walking statue really that much worse than giant marshmallow man (well, yes it is, but that&#8217;s an argument for a different article). I think at the end of the day, <em>Ghostbusters II</em> just couldn&#8217;t live up to the hype surrounding it. Then again, how could it be expected to do so, considering the original might be the greatest comedy of all time (screw you, <em>Tootsie</em>). Here&#8217;s hoping <em>The Hangover Part II</em> doesn&#8217;t share the same fate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/15-comedy-sequels-that-make-us-worried-for-the-hangover-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Arthur’ Trailer Boasts More Of Brand’s Cheekiness</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/video/arthur-trailer-boasts-brand-new-footage-of-russells-cheekiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/video/arthur-trailer-boasts-brand-new-footage-of-russells-cheekiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Horwitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dudley Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greta Gerwig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helen mirren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell Brand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?post_type=Video&#038;p=26165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hide your tea, hide your crumpets, because Russell Brand is getting DOWNRIGHT CHEEKY all over errybody in this first trailer for the upcoming remake of 'Arthur'.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right, <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/russell-brand-754/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Russell Brand</a> is downright cheeky in this first trailer for the upcoming remake of Dudley Moore&#8217;s <em>Arthur</em>. I know, I was as surprised as you are, but there it is: cheekiness on display. Brand in a bathtub: cheeky. Brand on a horse: cheeky. Brand in a Batman costume: cheeky overload. It&#8217;s unsure how actually funny the film (or Brand) will be, but one thing is for sure: when you mix the guy who has sex with <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/Video/katy-perry-in-latex-sexed-up-the-simpsons/">Katy Perry</a> with <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/dust-off-the-old-people-and-guns-red-sequel-being-penned/">Helen Mirren</a>, Luis Guzman, <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/greta-gerwig/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Greta Gerwig</a>, and source material from the legendary Dudley Moore, things are going to get&#8230; cheeky. <em>Arthur</em> is in (cheeky) theaters everywhere April 8th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/video/arthur-trailer-boasts-brand-new-footage-of-russells-cheekiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Dexter In 60 Seconds&#8217; Saves You A LOT Of Time</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/video/dexter-in-60-seconds-saves-you-a-lot-of-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/video/dexter-in-60-seconds-saves-you-a-lot-of-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Horwitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dexter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael c. hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serial Killer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sketch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?post_type=Video&#038;p=22184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why slog through five seasons of 'Dexter' when you can get the gist in the same time it takes to make rice in the microwave? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re like me, you have no real tolerance for Showtime&#8217;s&#8221;<a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tv/shows/dexter' target='_blank'>Dexter</a>.&#8221; It&#8217;s not bad, it&#8217;s not great, but it can be VERY grating. I think the show would be a lot more palatable if it was 1 minute long, and so does Landline.tv, who produced this absolutely spot on parody of the serial-killer-who-kills-serial-killers-series (say that even ONE time fast). Why slog through four seasons of this show when you can get the gist in the same time it takes to make rice in the microwave? (<a href="http://warmingglow.uproxx.com/2011/01/dexter-in-60-seconds" rel="nofollow">Warming Glow</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/video/dexter-in-60-seconds-saves-you-a-lot-of-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alexander Payne To Hit The Road Again</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/payne-heads-to-nebraska-for-next-film/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/payne-heads-to-nebraska-for-next-film/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Horwitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alexander payne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indie film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=17582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alexander Payne, director of such melancholy comedy classics as About Schmidt and Sideways, is returning to similar thematic territory with the road trip comedy Nebraska.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/payne.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-17601" style="margin-left: 7px; margin-right: 7px;" title="payne" src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/payne.jpg" alt='' width="316" height="236" /></a>Alexander Payne, director of such melancholy <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/comedy-classics/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>comedy classics</a> as <em>About Schmidt</em> and <em>Sideways</em>, is returning to similar thematic territory with the <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/road-trip/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>road trip</a> comedy <em>Nebraska</em>. Payne, who recently completed the drama <em>The Descendants</em>, was given Robert Nelson&#8217;s script for <em>Nebraska</em> way back in 2004, but wanted to put some distance between himself and the project after completing <em>Schmidt</em> and <em>Sideways</em>, two road movies, back-to-back.</p>
<p><em>Nebraska</em>, which is about a father who thinks he&#8217;s won the Publisher&#8217;s Clearing House sweepstakes and his estranged son who must accompany him for the ride to claim it, even though he believes the ticket is not a winner, has cast no actors yet. However, Robert Forster, who is also in <em>The Descendants</em>, is being thought of for the father role, and<a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/review-the-town/"> Ben Affleck</a> could be the son, although, according to producer Ron Yerxa, “Alexander can’t cast an actor until he’s read for the part and he knows he’s exactly right for it.” Shooting will begin later this year, and while many elements are stil <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/films/up-in-the-air' target='_blank'>up in the air</a>, we can probably expect the usual from Alexander Payne: men in crisis, unflattering closeups, hilarious awkwardness, and of course, <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/general/9-nude-scenes-to-avoid-on-film/">Kathy Bates naked</a>. (<a href="http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/archives/alexander_paynes_next_film_will_be_nebraska/" rel="nofollow">The Playlist</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/payne-heads-to-nebraska-for-next-film/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim Carrey&#8217;s &#8216;Under Cover&#8217; May Land Director David O. Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/jim-carreys-under-cover-may-land-director-david-o-russell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/jim-carreys-under-cover-may-land-director-david-o-russell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david o. russell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Carrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Under Cover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
David O. Russell is in the running to direct the upcoming Jim Carrey comedy, Under Cover, 24 Frames is reporting. In the film, Carrey will play a divorced dad who joins a local &#34;cover band to raise money to win the custody battle against his ex-wife.&#34;

This would mark Russell&#039;s first comedy since I Heart Huckabees, and would probably be less on the &#34;existential&#34; side, whatever the hell that means. But I&#039;m sure the film will be a success as long as Russell is able to land a part for Lily Tomlin (First Showing).
Watch David O. Russell drop the C-Bomb on Lily Tomlin after the jump (NSFW)...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movievideo/fighter-trailer-wants-your-oscar-vote"><img width="450" height="364" alt="" src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/images/2010b/200804_David.-O-Russell.jpg" /></a></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movievideo/fighter-trailer-wants-your-oscar-vote">David O. Russell</a> is in the running to direct the upcoming Jim Carrey comedy, <em>Under Cover</em>, <a target="_blank" href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/movies/2010/09/under-cover-jim-carrey-summit-david-o-russell.html" rel="nofollow">24 Frames</a> is reporting. In the film, Carrey will play a divorced dad who joins a local &quot;cover band to raise money to win the custody battle against his ex-wife.&quot;</p>
<p>This would mark Russell&#8217;s first <a target="_blank" href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movienews/john-goodman-moves-red-state">comedy</a> since<em> I</em> <em>Heart Huckabees</em>, and would probably be less on the &quot;existential&quot; side, whatever the hell that means. But I&#8217;m sure the film will be a success as long as Russell is able to land a part for Lily Tomlin (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.firstshowing.net/2010/09/21/david-o-russell-might-end-up-under-cover-with-jim-carrey/#comment-267217" rel="nofollow">First Showing</a>).</p>
<p><strong>Watch <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/david-o.-russell-43/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>David O. Russell</a> drop the C-Bomb on Lily Tomlin after the jump (NSFW)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><!--break--></p>
<p><object width="545" height="442" alt="<a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/david-o-russell/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>David O Russell</a> Blows Up on Lily Tomlin Funny  Videos&#8221; classid=&#8221;clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000&#8243; type=&#8221;application/x-shockwave-flash&#8221; id=&#8221;1393743&#8243;><param value="http://embed.break.com/MTM5Mzc0Mw==" name="movie" /><param value="always" name="allowScriptAccess" /><embed width="464" height="376" allowscriptaccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://embed.break.com/MTM5Mzc0Mw=="></embed></object><br />
<font size="1"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.break.com/usercontent/2009/9/david-o-russell-blows-up-on-lily-tomlin-1393743.html">David O Russell Blows Up on Lily Tomlin</a> &#8211; Watch more <a target="_blank" href="http://www.break.com">Funny  Videos</a></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/jim-carreys-under-cover-may-land-director-david-o-russell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MYSTERY TEAM</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/mystery-team/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/mystery-team/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derrick Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funny Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mystery Team]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Director: Dan EckmanCast: Donald Glover, D.C. Pierson, Dominic Dierkes, Aubrey Plaza, Matt WalshSynopsis: At age seven, Oakdale&#039;s Mystery Team was a band of kid detectives dedicated to solving child-sized mysteries (like who put their finger in the pie, and who stole the tricycle), and the town loved them for it. Now they&#039;re eighteen years old, about to graduate from high school, yet they&#039;re still storming the playground to bust little kids, and the town of Oakdale is sick to death of it.When a little girl sees their sign advertising &#34;Mysteries Solved, Ten Cents,&#34; she asks the gang to find out who killed her parents. The Team embarks on a mystery that takes them deep into a violent conspiracy that sees their lives threatened, their friendship strained and tests their claim that they&#039;re &#34;real detectives.&#34;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img height="358" width="550" src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/images/2009/Mystery_Team_Poster.jpg" alt='' /></p>
<p><strong>Director:</strong> Dan Eckman</p>
<p><strong>Cast: </strong>Donald Glover, D.C. Pierson, Dominic Dierkes, <strong>Aubrey Plaza</strong>, Matt Walsh</p>
<p><strong>Synopsis:</strong> At age seven, Oakdale&#8217;s Mystery Team was a band of kid detectives dedicated to solving child-sized mysteries (like who put their finger in the pie, and who stole the tricycle), and <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/films/the-town' target='_blank'>the town</a> loved them for it. Now they&#8217;re eighteen years old, about to graduate from <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/films/high-school' target='_blank'>high school</a>, yet they&#8217;re still storming the playground to bust little kids, and the town of Oakdale is sick to death of it.</p>
<p>When a little girl sees their sign advertising &quot;Mysteries Solved, Ten Cents,&quot; she asks the gang to find out who killed her parents. The Team embarks on a mystery that takes them deep into a violent conspiracy that sees their lives threatened, their friendship strained and tests their claim that they&#8217;re &quot;real detectives.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/mystery-team/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 10/38 queries in 0.044 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 484/840 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn2.screenjunkies.com

Served from: www.screenjunkies.com @ 2013-05-19 15:54:33 -->