<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Screen Junkies &#187; Arthur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/arthur-31/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com</link>
	<description>Movie Reviews &#38; TV Show Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:57:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Russell Brand Uninvited From People&#8217;s Choice Awards. NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/russell-brand-uninvited-from-peoples-choice-awards-nooooooooooooo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/russell-brand-uninvited-from-peoples-choice-awards-nooooooooooooo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Penn Collins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[katy perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[people's choice awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell Brand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=241892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shame on you, People's Choice Awards, for disinviting Brand. SHAME ON YOUR EYES!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The impact of the saddest Hollywood <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/divorce/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>divorce</a> this month just got real. The separation claimed its first casualty: people who fall in the overlap of the Venn diagram circles &#8220;People&#8217;s Choice Award enthusiasts&#8221; and &#8220;<a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/the-president-is-going-to-steal-russell-brands-girlfriend/" target="_blank">Russell Brand</a> fans.&#8221;</p>
<p>It would seem that due to the <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/actor/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>actor</a>&#8216;s impending divorce from starlet <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/katy-perry-315/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Katy Perry</a>, he has been disinvited from the <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/awards/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>awards</a> ceremony. THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN!</p>
<p><em>But when people are heartbroken, that&#8217;s when they need the <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/peoples-choice-awards/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>People&#8217;s Choice Awards</a> THE MOST!</em></p>
<p>Perry is nominated for seven awards, whereas Brand hasn&#8217;t gotten shit for his turn in <em>Arthur</em>, so the choice was presumably an easy one for <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/producers/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>producers</a>. The good news here is that if the split remains acrimonious for a long time, we can expect to not see <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/actors-directors/surprisingly-smart-russell-brand-quotes/" target="_blank">Russell Brand</a> at a lot of our favorite events.</p>
<p>Silver lining!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/russell-brand-uninvited-from-peoples-choice-awards-nooooooooooooo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekend Box Office Report: Another Damn CGI Bird Movie</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/weekend-box-office-report-another-damn-cgi-bird-movie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/weekend-box-office-report-another-damn-cgi-bird-movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Gibson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scre4m]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the conspirator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekend Box Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=207489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Screen Junkies weren't the only ones going to 'Rio' over the weekend.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Rio-Movie-550x266.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-207507" style="margin-left: 7px; margin-right: 7px;" title="Rio-Movie-300x225" src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Rio-Movie-550x266.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>American parents are desperate for something, anything, to shut their kids up for a couple hours. And Fox&#8217;s animation studio Blue Sky Studios, knows just <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/films/the-thing' class='linkify' target='_blank'>the thing</a> &#8211; talking CGI animals! So it probably doesn&#8217;t come as much of a surprise that their latest soon-to-be-forgotten product, <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/Video/first-two-minutes-of-rio-makes-me-reconsider-the-ethics-of-bird-hunting/" target="_blank"><em>Rio</em></a>, easily cinched the first place spot over the weekend with $40 million. For those not keeping track, that makes it the highest-grossing movie so far this year. I guess this means a sequel, <em>Rio 2: Lost in Rio</em> is inevitable.</p>
<p>The rest of the weekend slate didn&#8217;t do as well, with <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-review/review-scream-4/" target="_blank"><em>Scream 4</em></a>, the 4th entry in the increasingly-pointless <em>Scream </em>series, making just under $20 million for second place. The rest of the top spots were filled by old favorites like <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/weekend-box-office-report-its-hop-time-in-america/" target="_blank"><em>Hop </em>and <em>Arthur</em></a>, with the exception of <em>The Conspirator</em> in 9th place with a $3.9 million <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/gross/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>gross</a>. Perhaps if <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/robert-redford/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Robert Redford</a> had made <em>The Conspirator </em>a CGI kids&#8217; comedy about Abraham Toucan getting shot in the head by John Wilkes Orangutan, it would be a different story. (<a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Box Office Mojo</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/weekend-box-office-report-another-damn-cgi-bird-movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekend Box Office: Russell Brand Is Supernova Hot</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/weekend-box-office-russell-brand-is-supernova-hot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/weekend-box-office-russell-brand-is-supernova-hot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Gibson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soul Surfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekend Box Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=206423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russell Brand knows what a small portion of the people want.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/arthur_set_01_wenn2928598.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-206428" style="margin-left: 7px; margin-right: 7px;" title="arthur_set_01_wenn2928598" src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/arthur_set_01_wenn2928598.jpg" alt='' width="300" height="225" /></a>That&#8217;s right, America &#8211; the demigod from the <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/uk/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>UK</a> known as <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/russell-brand-754/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Russell Brand</a> has finally &#8220;hit it big,&#8221; with both the number one and number two movies in America featuring his tricky-to-spell name on the poster. Of course, he picked a couple of pretty mediocre earners with which to earn this badge of honor, with the badly-reviewed comedy remake <em><a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-review/review-arthur/" target="_blank">Arthur</a> </em>and the badly-reviewed comedy Easter CGI rabbit movie <em>Hop</em>. And I don&#8217;t just mean the <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/tv-review-753/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>reviews</a> are mediocre: the films earned only $12.6 million and $21.6 million, respectively. No, you&#8217;re not misreading that. Plus,<em>Hop </em>has been the number one movie for <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/weekend-box-office-report-its-hop-time-in-america/" target="_blank">two weekends in a row</a>. Maybe it will keep plugging along until Easter.</p>
<p>Rounding out the weekend was the pretty excellent <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-review/review-hanna/" target="_blank"><em>Hanna</em></a>, which managed third place with $12.3 million, and <em>Soul Surfer</em>, the <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/inspirational/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>inspirational</a> sports version of <em>Jaws</em>, in fourth place with $11.1 million. I&#8217;ve said it for years: If you want to make bank at <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/films/the-box' target='_blank'>the box</a> office, you&#8217;ve got to have more than one person getting eaten by a shark. (<a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Box Office Mojo</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/weekend-box-office-russell-brand-is-supernova-hot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-review/review-arthur/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-review/review-arthur/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Topel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greta Gerwig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helen mirren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason winer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Garner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell Brand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=205866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You won’t mind watching it because of Brand and Mirren, and Gerwig is sweet, but there’s nothing memorable or hilarious.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/brand-arthur-official-2-e1302037023819.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-205475" title="brand-arthur-official-2" src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/brand-arthur-official-2-e1302037023819.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="277" /></a></p>
<p><a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/russell-brand-754/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Russell Brand</a> and <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/helen-mirren-879/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Helen Mirren</a> are so good, it makes <em><a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/Video/new-arthur-trailer-is-rich-with-failed-jokes/" target="_blank">Arthur</a> </em>entertaining. It’s still the same old contrived Hollywood formula, and it’s not a particularly good version of it, but Brand and Mirren have fun throughout.</p>
<p>In case this seems like an original idea to you, <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/arthur-31/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Arthur</a> (Brand) is a billionaire heir to the Bach Worldwide corporation. He gets into trouble dressing as Batman and crashing a <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/batmobile-103/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Batmobile</a>, which embarrasses his mother Vivienne. Vivienne plans to marry him off to Susan (Jennifer Garner), otherwise she’ll cut him off. It’s at that exact point in his life and the story that he meets whimsical Grand Central Terminal tour guide Naomi (Greta Gerwig). So he’s torn between keeping his money and going with his heart, and his nanny Hobson (Mirren) tries to steer him right.</p>
<p>This is mainly a collection of contrived set pieces, but that’s where Brand does his best work. He goes all out in the proposal dinner scene and doesn’t miss an opportunity to jump around, be foolish or slip in a clever joke. Brand is having fun sneering at the formula he’s stuck in, down to Arthur’s stint working in a candy store.</p>
<p>Hobson is funny despite being pretty mean. Calling women streetwalkers and tarts is just bullying, but Mirren is so classy she pulls off the humor in it. Her references to spoilers are more appreciated than putdowns. Susan is a totally one dimensional villain obsessed with money and status. Her drunk dominatrix schtick is beneath Garner.</p>
<p>Arthur is a good character. As much of his recklessness is selfless, giving away money or helping people achieve their dreams, as the other half is hedonistic. He does want noble things like conversation in a relationship, so the physical promises Susan makes actually offend his sensibilities.</p>
<p>The only modern touches are a brief mention of the recession and an upskirt (upkilt) shot of Arthur’s blurred out junk. I guess you could also count how this remake does what all Hollywood comedies do now and goes all serious. But the movie doesn’t seem to know when Arthur’s learned his lesson so it keeps getting serious and goes way past heartwarming. Then it takes so long to work out the plot with a wedding, running around Queens naked and another whole <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/montage-855/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>montage</a>.</p>
<p>You won’t mind watching <em>Arthur </em>because of Brand and Mirren, and Gerwig is sweet, but there’s nothing memorable or hilarious. It’s just pleasant enough, which can be fine. Sometimes we just want to see pretty people have fun. That’s all this <em>Arthur </em>is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-review/review-arthur/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9 Greatest Rich Pricks In Cinema History</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/9-greatest-rich-pricks-in-cinema-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/9-greatest-rich-pricks-in-cinema-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jame Gumb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur remake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?p=205463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moviegoers have always been fascinated by wealthy characters, even if those characters happen to be total pricks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/brand-arthur-official-2.jpg"><img src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/brand-arthur-official-2-e1302037023819.jpg" alt="" title="brand-arthur-official-2" width="500" height="277" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-205475" /></a></p>
<p>Moviegoers have always been fascinated by <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/homeless-radio-guy-now-going-to-be-wealthy-television-guy/" target="_blank">wealthy characters</a>, even if those characters happen to be total pricks. After all, if losers like you or me wanted to see people living in squalor, we could simply take a walking tour of our Section 8 housing complex. No, <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/Video/new-arthur-trailer-is-rich-with-failed-jokes/">rich</a> people are far more interesting, with their mansions, expensive cars, beautiful women, etc. Who cares if they take part in some unscrupulous business deals, or kill a few <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/hookers/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>hookers</a>? As the following characters prove, enough money will make most problems go away.</p>
<h4>Gordon Gekko &#8211; <em>Wall Street</em> (1987)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/gordon-gekko1.jpg"><img src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/gordon-gekko1-e1302037655571.jpg" alt="" title="gordon-gekko" width="500" height="333" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-205477" /></a></p>
<p><a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/greed/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Greed</a>, for lack of a better word, is good. So says Gordon Gekko, the epitome of <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/80s/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>80&#8242;s</a> excess. Speaking of excess, just look at his fancy mobile phone. It&#8217;s so small and compact, yet he&#8217;s using it outside at the beach! The f*cking beach! OK, now that they give cellphones away for free, maybe it&#8217;s not as impressive. But at the time, that thing must have cost a fortune. </p>
<p>Remember when I said money makes most problems go away? Well, most doesn&#8217;t mean all. Gordon ends up heading to the clink for his shady business dealings. I&#8217;m not sure what happened when he got out, because I, like everyone else, never watched the sequel.</p>
<h4>Billy Madison &#8211; <em>Billy Madison</em> (1995)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/billy-madison.jpg"><img src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/billy-madison-e1302038001160.jpg" alt="" title="billy-madison" width="500" height="351" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-205481" /></a></p>
<p>Billy Madison is a likable guy. But that doesn&#8217;t exclude him from being a rich prick. How else would you describe a grown man who is wealthy enough to spend his days reading <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/porno-23/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>porno</a>, playing &#8220;make believe&#8221; in his bathtub, and leaving flaming bags of shit on an old man&#8217;s door step?</p>
<h4>John Gage &#8211; <em>Indecent Proposal</em> (1993)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/robert-redford.jpg"><img src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/robert-redford-e1302039272960.jpg" alt="" title="robert-redford" width="500" height="333" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-205464" /></a></p>
<p>John Gage is the epitome of a rich prick. He knows he can buy and sell any man in <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/the-room/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>the room</a>. More importantly, he knows he can also buy any man&#8217;s wife. Well, almost any man. If he offered me a million dollars for a night with my spouse, I&#8217;d have to say know. Call me old fashioned, but I was raised not to take advantage of people.</p>
<h4>The Dukes &#8211; <em>Trading Places</em> (1983)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/08_TradingPlaces_BD.jpg"><img src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/08_TradingPlaces_BD-e1302039531328.jpg" alt="" title="08_TradingPlaces_BD" width="500" height="286" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-205465" /></a></p>
<p>The Dukes (Randolph and Mortimer) are wealthy beyond your wildest dreams. But when you can literally buy anything you desire, things tend to get boring. That&#8217;s why they decide to spice things up by manipulating a homeless guy and reducing one of their employees to ruins. It&#8217;s a great way to pass the time, if you can afford it.</p>
<h4>Patrick Bateman &#8211; <em>American Psycho</em> (2000)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/patrick-bateman1.jpg"><img src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/patrick-bateman1-e1302039627433.jpg" alt="" title="patrick-bateman1" width="500" height="372" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-205470" /></a></p>
<p>Having sex with a bevy of beautiful women: boring! Having sex with those women, and then cutting them up into tiny pieces: awesome!  At least that&#8217;s what rich prick <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/patrick-bateman/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Patrick Bateman</a> thinks. A lot of people find that disturbing, but his other hobby is listening to Phil Collins. Between the two, I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s a toss up.</p>
<h4>Claus von Bülow &#8211; <em>Reversal of Fortune</em> (1990)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/clause-von-buelow.jpg"><img src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/clause-von-buelow-e1302039793448.jpg" alt="" title="claus von buelow" width="500" height="375" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-205469" /></a></p>
<p>OK, now do you remember when I said money will fix almost anything? This is a much better example. Claus von Bülow is a real person who was accused of murdering his wife. He was also a fabulously rich prick. The movie tells the story of how Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz got him off the hook. He&#8217;s the same guy who helped another rich prick, OJ Simpson, beat his murder rap.</p>
<h4>Jeffrey Lebowski &#8211; <em>The Big Lebowski</em> (1998)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/biglebowski.jpg"><img src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/biglebowski-e1302039995143.jpg" alt="" title="biglebowski" width="500" height="375" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-205467" /></a></p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m a Lebowski, you&#8217;re a Lebowski. That&#8217;s terrific.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jeffrey Lebowski is definitely a prick. But despite the outward appearance of wealth, he&#8217;s not actually rich. His daughter controls his estate, and gives him a monthly allowance, which is ample. However, thanks to the unwitting help of another Jeffrey Lebowski (a.k.a. The Dude), he&#8217;s able to embezzle a cool million form the Urban Achievers fund, which only adds to his prick-ness.  </p>
<h4>Charles Foster Kane &#8211; <em>Citizen Kane</em> (1941)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/citizen_kane-decade-best.jpg"><img src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/citizen_kane-decade-best-e1302040553711.jpg" alt="" title="citizen_kane decade best" width="500" height="374" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-205466" /></a></p>
<p>What cinematic rich-prick list would be complete without including Charles Foster Kane. After all, he&#8217;s the prototype by which all wealthy assholes are judged. In fact, this film is considered the <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/citizen-kane/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Citizen Kane</a> of rich-pick Movies. </p>
<h4>Dudley Moore &#8211; <em>Arthur</em> (1981)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/dudley-moore-in-arthur.jpg"><img src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/dudley-moore-in-arthur-e1302041019158.jpg" alt="" title="dudley-moore-in-arthur" width="500" height="305" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-205490" /></a></p>
<p>Yeah, yeah, yeah: <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/russell-brand-754/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Russell Brand</a> is funny. But when it comes to <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/arthur-31/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Arthur</a>, Dudley Moore will always be number one. He&#8217;s a drunken wealthy ass, but at the end of the day, he&#8217;d be a blast to hang out with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/9-greatest-rich-pricks-in-cinema-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jennifer Garner</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/gallery/jennifer-garner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/gallery/jennifer-garner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reza F.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Garner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?post_type=Gallery&#038;p=205215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jennifer Garner has come a long way since her days of leather speedsuits and extended TV action sequences. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mademan.com/chickipedia/jennifer-garner/" target="_blank">Jennifer Garner</a> has come a long way since her days of leather speedsuits and extended TV action sequences. The former &#8220;Alias&#8221; star, who still occasionally returns to the gun when prompted, has demonstrated an impressive range of roles throughout her career, bouncing from science ficition to romantic comedy, indie comedy, and more romantic comedy. She&#8217;ll be trying her hand at &#8220;remake of an eighties comedy&#8221; again with her role alongside <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/russell-brand-754/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Russell Brand</a> in <em>Arthur</em>, out this week.</p>
<p><strong>A word from Jennifer:</strong> &#8220;There&#8217;s something so interesting about the combination of vulnerability and being completely in control at the same time.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/gallery/jennifer-garner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Arthur’ Trailer Boasts More Of Brand’s Cheekiness</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/video/arthur-trailer-boasts-brand-new-footage-of-russells-cheekiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/video/arthur-trailer-boasts-brand-new-footage-of-russells-cheekiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Horwitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dudley Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greta Gerwig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helen mirren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell Brand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenjunkies.com/?post_type=Video&#038;p=26165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hide your tea, hide your crumpets, because Russell Brand is getting DOWNRIGHT CHEEKY all over errybody in this first trailer for the upcoming remake of 'Arthur'.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right, <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/russell-brand-754/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Russell Brand</a> is downright cheeky in this first trailer for the upcoming remake of Dudley Moore&#8217;s <em>Arthur</em>. I know, I was as surprised as you are, but there it is: cheekiness on display. Brand in a bathtub: cheeky. Brand on a horse: cheeky. Brand in a Batman costume: cheeky overload. It&#8217;s unsure how actually funny the film (or Brand) will be, but one thing is for sure: when you mix the guy who has sex with <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/Video/katy-perry-in-latex-sexed-up-the-simpsons/">Katy Perry</a> with <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/dust-off-the-old-people-and-guns-red-sequel-being-penned/">Helen Mirren</a>, Luis Guzman, <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/greta-gerwig/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Greta Gerwig</a>, and source material from the legendary Dudley Moore, things are going to get&#8230; cheeky. <em>Arthur</em> is in (cheeky) theaters everywhere April 8th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/video/arthur-trailer-boasts-brand-new-footage-of-russells-cheekiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Helen Mirren and Russell Brand Give &#8216;Arthur&#8217; a Happy Ending</title>
		<link>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/helen-mirren-and-russell-brand-give-arthur-a-happy-ending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/helen-mirren-and-russell-brand-give-arthur-a-happy-ending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Betty White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helen mirren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taylor lautner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Who says Hollywood is out of ideas? Obviously they haven&#039;t seen this picture of Helen Mirren giving Russell Brand the old &#34;rub &#38; tug&#34; on the set of Arthur. In fact, seeing a geriatric Mirren giving Brand a bathtub HJ is the most original thing I&#039;ve seen in weeks, and mind you, I watch Bravo daily.

The only question is how is Hollywood going to top this? Chances are we&#039;ll see Betty White giving an &#34;Asian massage&#34; to the wolf-boy from Twilight sometime soon. &#34;Team Jacob&#34; indeed! (Cinema Blend)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="450" height="427" src="http://cdn2.screenjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/images/happy-ending-arthur.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Who says Hollywood is out of ideas? Obviously they haven&#8217;t seen this picture of <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/helen-mirren-879/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Helen Mirren</a> giving <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/russell-brand-754/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Russell Brand</a> the old &quot;rub &amp; tug&quot; on the <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movienews/batman-and-arthur-together-last" target="_blank">set of <em>Arthur</em></a>. In fact, seeing a geriatric Mirren giving Brand a bathtub HJ is the most original thing I&#8217;ve seen in weeks, and mind you, I watch <a href='http://www.screenjunkies.com/tag/bravo/' class='linkify' target='_blank'>Bravo</a> daily.</p>
<p>The only question is how is Hollywood going to top this? Chances are we&#8217;ll see <a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/tvnews/betty-white-gives-back-community" target="_blank">Betty White giving</a> an &quot;Asian massage&quot; to the wolf-boy from <em>Twilight</em> sometime soon. &quot;Team Jacob&quot; indeed! (<a href="http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Helen-Mirren-Gives-Russell-Brand-A-Bath-On-The-Arthur-Set-20083.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Cinema Blend</a>)</p>
<p><!--break--></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/helen-mirren-and-russell-brand-give-arthur-a-happy-ending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 7/18 queries in 0.017 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 399/668 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn2.screenjunkies.com

Served from: www.screenjunkies.com @ 2013-05-24 06:44:47 -->